OpenLibrary

From EmergiaWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Draft of a position paper for a round table at a workshop --JosebaAbaitua 09:40 25 mar, 2009 (CET): II Jornadas sobre Documentación y Gestión de los contenidos digitales / Dokumentazio eta eduki digitalen kudeaketari buruzko II.Jardunaldiak

Apirilak 29 eta 30


Contents

[edit] Abstract

A digital library contains no single page that has not been read at least once and that cannot be retrieved once filed. The digitization of information is an unstoppable process prospectively, but also retropectively.

Among the many questions that are unresolved, I would like to focus on one (for which I know the answer) but that leads to another one (for which I have not found an answer yet). The first question is: What is the format, or rather the ideal genre for the transmission of knowledge? The second is: Is there anything like a unity of knowledge? The paper will try to explain the importance of this second question.

English version produced by Google [1]


Una biblioteca digital no contiene una sóla página que no haya sido leída al menos una vez y que no pueda volver a ser recuperada una vez se archiva. La digitalización de la información es un proceso imparable en prospectiva pero también en retropesctiva.

Entre las múltiples cuestiones que están pendientes de resolver, me gustaría centrarme en una (que creo sé responder) pero que lleva a otra (para la que todavía no he encontrado respuesta). La primera es: ¿Cuál es el formato, o mejor dicho el género ideal para la transmisión de conocimiento?. La segunda ¿Hay algo parecido a la unidad de conocimiento? En la ponencia trataré de explicar la importancia de esta pregunta.


Liburutegi digitaletan ez dago orri bat ere irakurri gabea, edo gutxienez behin ez den irakurri; eta artxibatu ostean, erraz berreskuratuko ez dena. Informazioaren digitalizazioa eten ezineko prozesua da, aurrea begira bai eta atzera begira ere.

Oraindik ebatzi gabe dauden arazoen artean, azaltzen dakidan bat nahi nuke mahaira ekarri. Baina honek oraindik erantzun ez dakidan beste batera eramango gaitu. Lehenengoa da ea zein den ezagupenaren transmizioarako formatu, edo hobeto esanda generorik egokiena. Bigarrena da: Ba al dago ezagupen unitaterik? Mahainguruan, bigarren galdera honen garrantziaz arituko naiz, nahiz eta erantzunik ez izan oraindik.

[edit] Orri irakurgabeak

  1. Liburutegietan sartzen naizenean, edo argitaletxeen liburu berrien katalogoak hartzen ditudanean aspaldidanik bururatzen zait gauza bera (ikus #2)
    1. unibertsitate liburutegietan batez ere (batean izan eziki)
    2. Argitaletxeen negozio eredua horretan datza
  2. "Orriok betetzen egileek orduak eta orduak bete dituzte eta hemen dauden guztietatik zenbat dago irakurgabe?"
    1. Orri horietan jaso den ezagupenaren parte handiena irakurlegorik gabe geratuko da (edo irakurlego murritzarekin)
    2. Irakurlego murritza baina kalitatekoa? Ohiartzuna izango duena?
    3. Liburuek ez dute ezagupena bakarrik gordetzen (datuak, informazioa, ezagupena, jakintza... baina emozioak ere, Searl 1965), baina gizarteak ezagutzen duen guztia liburuetan dago
    4. Sánchez Ferlosio "Nadie lee"

[edit] Genre matters

Which genre is better suited for knowledge transfer?

  • blogging, microblogging
  • Wikipedia articles [2]
  • Scholarly papers
  • Reports, essays
  • Slides, videos
  • Records [3] [4], snippets [5]
  • Turtle RDF [6], microformats
  • Frames [7], scripts [8]

[edit] Knowledge units

With blogs, microblogs, microformats and RDF triples we know how to harvest and aggregate.

But is that the model that can be applied to everything else, particularly in Science? How are things at present with digital libraries?

Examples?

  • Citeseer (GoogleScholar)
  • ePrints

[edit] References

Krichel, Thomas and Koenig, Michael E.D. From open access to open libraries: claims and visions for Open Academic Libraries., 2004 . In International Conference of Digital Library: Advance the Efficiency of Knowledge Utilization, Beijing (China), 6-8 September 2004. (In Press) [Conference Paper] http://eprints.rclis.org/2202/

Finn, A. & Kushmerick, N. (2006). Learning to classify documents according to genre. To appear Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), Special Issue on Computational Analysis of Style, volume 57, number 11, September 2006. pdf

@article{finn2002gca, 

 title=Template:Genre classification and domain transfer for information filtering,
 author={Finn, A. and Kushmerick, N. and Smyth, B.},
 journal={Lecture notes in computer science},
 pages={353--362},
 year={2002},
 publisher={Springer}

}

@article{finn2006lcd, 

 title=Template:Learning to classify documents according to genre,
 author={Finn, A. and Kushmerick, N.},
 journal={Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology},
 volume={57},
 number={11},
 pages={1506--18},
 year={2006},
 publisher={Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company Hoboken}

}


Retrieved from "http://wiki.emergiatech.com/index.php/OpenLibrary"
Personal tools